Discussion:
JK Rowling leads feminist backlash against Sturgeon for 'rewriting history' over gender self-ID row
Add Reply
Leroy N. Soetoro
2024-12-26 20:33:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/12/23/jk-rowling-feminist-backlash-
against-sturgeon-self-id/

JK Rowling led a feminist backlash on Monday against Nicola Sturgeon after
she was accused of “rewriting history” over the gender self-ID law
controversy.

The Harry Potter author said the former Scottish first minister was
attempting to invent a “worthy adversary” to blame for the public
opposition her gender Bill provoked.

Instead, Ms Sturgeon was refusing to accept the backlash had been driven
by normal women who were outraged over her plans, Rowling said.

It followed a series of Scottish women’s groups signing a joint letter
urging Ms Sturgeon to name the “forces” she recently claimed had “muscled
in” on the trans debate in Scotland as part of an agenda to “push back
rights generally”.

In a round of media interviews, she raised eyebrows by claiming there was
no “massive public opposition” to her law until it passed. At the time it
was seen as one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in
Holyrood’s history and it provoked an unprecedented SNP rebellion.

Ms Sturgeon’s self-ID law would have allowed any Scot aged 16 and over to
change their legal sex simply by signing a declaration, but it was later
blocked by the UK Government meaning it never came into force.

Responding to the letter calling on Ms Sturgeon to name the “forces” she
was referring to, Rowling said: “Her ego requires her signature Bill to
have been opposed by something she considers a worthy adversary, rather
than members of the public who don’t want cross-dressing men running rape
crisis centres.”

She suggested that someone buy Ms Sturgeon the book “The Women Who
Wouldn’t Wheesht” for Christmas, a series of essays about the grassroots
opposition to the self-ID law, which Rowling contributed to.

The letter to Ms Sturgeon was signed by seven feminist groups including
For Women Scotland, which is awaiting a ruling from Supreme Court judges
about the legal impact of gender recognition certificates (GRCs), which
the self-ID law would have made widely available to Scots.

In the legal case, Scottish Government lawyers undermined assurances Ms
Sturgeon and other SNP ministers gave while their Bill was being
scrutinised at Holyrood.

They accepted GRCs change a person’s sex for the purposes of the Equality
Act and bestow significant new rights on those who hold them, whereas
previously the law had been presented as bringing about a minor
bureaucratic change.

The letter to Ms Sturgeon urged her to “move away from dropping broad
hints” and to present evidence to back up her claims.

“If you believe that there are groups or individuals with an agenda to
‘push back rights generally’ who are ‘muscling in’ on Scottish politics,
you have a duty to state who or what you believe they are, and how you
believe they are operating in Scotland, as precisely as possible,” it
said.

“Then, the influence of any such groups or individuals can be properly
investigated and challenged, as necessary.

“As it stands, regardless of your intentions, a person might reasonably
believe you are referring to those groups or individuals who played a
leading part in criticising the Scottish Government’s proposals.”

In a series of interviews last week, Ms Sturgeon drew comparisons between
the acrimonious nature of rows over trans rights and the more civilised
debate over gay marriage legislation, which passed a decade ago in
Scotland.

https://img-s-msn-
com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1wnu5w.img?w=768&h=754&m=6

JK Rowling leads feminist backlash against Sturgeon for ‘rewriting
history’ over gender self-ID row
She claimed a debate over equal marriage would be “much more toxic,
divisive and unpleasant” had it taken place today, and bemoaned the
“polarised” nature of political discourse her critics claim she was in
part to blame for in Scotland.

She added: “We consulted on the [self-ID] legislation for longer than we
consulted on anything else and right up until the point of the legislation
passing, I don’t think it was the case that there was massive public
opposition.

“But things became so toxic and opposition became so entrenched and – this
is not the case for everybody who opposed that legislation – but there
were forces that muscled into that debate who, I think, you know, had a
bigger agenda in terms of rights more generally.”

The Scottish Tories accused Ms Sturgeon of attempting to rewrite history
and shifting the blame for her own failures, pointing out that she had
resolutely failed to compromise on her gender law.

A spokesman for Ms Sturgeon declined to comment.
--
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
forward to America being great again.

The disease known as Kamala Harris has been effectively treated and
eradicated.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.
Louis Epstein
2024-12-31 00:07:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In alt.fan.harry-potter "Leroy N. Soetoro" (claiming the fake address
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/12/23/jk-rowling-feminist-backlash-
against-sturgeon-self-id/
JK Rowling led a feminist backlash on Monday against Nicola Sturgeon after
she was accused of ?rewriting history? over the gender self-ID law
controversy.
The Harry Potter author said the former Scottish first minister was
attempting to invent a ?worthy adversary? to blame for the public
opposition her gender Bill provoked.
Instead, Ms Sturgeon was refusing to accept the backlash had been driven
by normal women who were outraged over her plans, Rowling said.
It followed a series of Scottish women?s groups signing a joint letter
urging Ms Sturgeon to name the ?forces? she recently claimed had ?muscled
in? on the trans debate in Scotland as part of an agenda to ?push back
rights generally?.
In a round of media interviews, she raised eyebrows by claiming there was
no ?massive public opposition? to her law until it passed. At the time it
was seen as one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in
Holyrood?s history and it provoked an unprecedented SNP rebellion.
Ms Sturgeon?s self-ID law would have allowed any Scot aged 16 and over to
change their legal sex simply by signing a declaration, but it was later
blocked by the UK Government meaning it never came into force.
Responding to the letter calling on Ms Sturgeon to name the ?forces? she
was referring to, Rowling said: ?Her ego requires her signature Bill to
have been opposed by something she considers a worthy adversary, rather
than members of the public who don?t want cross-dressing men running rape
crisis centres.?
She suggested that someone buy Ms Sturgeon the book ?The Women Who
Wouldn?t Wheesht? for Christmas, a series of essays about the grassroots
opposition to the self-ID law, which Rowling contributed to.
The letter to Ms Sturgeon was signed by seven feminist groups including
For Women Scotland, which is awaiting a ruling from Supreme Court judges
about the legal impact of gender recognition certificates (GRCs), which
the self-ID law would have made widely available to Scots.
In the legal case, Scottish Government lawyers undermined assurances Ms
Sturgeon and other SNP ministers gave while their Bill was being
scrutinised at Holyrood.
They accepted GRCs change a person?s sex for the purposes of the Equality
Act and bestow significant new rights on those who hold them, whereas
previously the law had been presented as bringing about a minor
bureaucratic change.
The letter to Ms Sturgeon urged her to ?move away from dropping broad
hints? and to present evidence to back up her claims.
?If you believe that there are groups or individuals with an agenda to
?push back rights generally? who are ?muscling in? on Scottish politics,
you have a duty to state who or what you believe they are, and how you
believe they are operating in Scotland, as precisely as possible,? it
said.
?Then, the influence of any such groups or individuals can be properly
investigated and challenged, as necessary.
?As it stands, regardless of your intentions, a person might reasonably
believe you are referring to those groups or individuals who played a
leading part in criticising the Scottish Government?s proposals.?
In a series of interviews last week, Ms Sturgeon drew comparisons between
the acrimonious nature of rows over trans rights and the more civilised
debate over gay marriage legislation, which passed a decade ago in
Scotland.
https://img-s-msn-
com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1wnu5w.img?w=768&h=754&m=6
JK Rowling leads feminist backlash against Sturgeon for ?rewriting
history? over gender self-ID row
She claimed a debate over equal marriage would be ?much more toxic,
divisive and unpleasant? had it taken place today, and bemoaned the
?polarised? nature of political discourse her critics claim she was in
part to blame for in Scotland.
She added: ?We consulted on the [self-ID] legislation for longer than we
consulted on anything else and right up until the point of the legislation
passing, I don?t think it was the case that there was massive public
opposition.
?But things became so toxic and opposition became so entrenched and ? this
is not the case for everybody who opposed that legislation ? but there
were forces that muscled into that debate who, I think, you know, had a
bigger agenda in terms of rights more generally.?
The Scottish Tories accused Ms Sturgeon of attempting to rewrite history
and shifting the blame for her own failures, pointing out that she had
resolutely failed to compromise on her gender law.
A spokesman for Ms Sturgeon declined to comment.
Rowling's in the right here,
but I need to deplore the OP's Trumpist .sig conveniently
insulated from quoting criticism by misguided Netnews conventions.

Both trans lies and Trump's lies merit massive condemnation.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.

Loading...